The lawyer who represented two Greek cops within the Harry Maguire assault case on Wednesday stated it was “stunning” that there was no apology from the Manchester United captain. Maguire was handed a 21-month suspended jail sentence on Tuesday after being discovered responsible of assaulting a police officer, tried bribery and different fees by a courtroom in Greece. The England defender, who didn’t attend Tuesday’s trial on the Greek island of Syros, shortly indicated his intention to enchantment, releasing a press release suggesting he and his household and mates had been the victims.
Manchester United additionally backed their participant, who denies all the costs.
The 27-year-old –the world’s most costly defender — was arrested final week after an incident at a nightclub in Mykonos and spent two nights in police custody earlier than flying residence.
Maguire’s brother Joe and good friend Christopher Sharman had been additionally discovered responsible on a variety of fees and sentenced to 13 months in jail, suspended for 3 years.
Lawyer Ioannis Paradissis stated an apology would, in Greek regulation, make a giant distinction in any appeals course of however stated none had been supplied.
“(The cops) informed me they’re nonetheless ready for an apology they usually have not had any,” Paradissis informed the BBC.
“That is what I discover fairly stunning and fairly unsporting. Honest play means once I’ve carried out one thing mistaken I apologise or at the least I say I’m sorry for what occurred to the opposite individual.”
Paradissis stated an enchantment would begin the trial afresh however that in Greek regulation a number of the accusations could possibly be withdrawn if an apology got and that “the end result is likely to be totally different”.
England supervisor Gareth Southgate withdrew Maguire from his squad for the Nations League matches towards Iceland and Denmark subsequent month, having initially chosen him on Tuesday.
In line with media studies, a struggle began at a nightclub over claims Maguire’s sister Daisy had been injected with what the defence claimed was a suspected drug.
Paradissis stated this was “irrelevant” in respect of the assault on the officers and that it was “unusual” that Maguire’s sister had not talked about this when she was interviewed by police.
Requested about Maguire’s declare that he was the sufferer, Paradissis stated: “We do not have the identical definition of what a sufferer is then, as a result of how are you going to be a sufferer and the policemen have been assaulted, hit, that had been simply doing their jobs?
“They went residence on the day with accidents. How can they not be a sufferer?”
Requested whether or not Maguire and his co-defendants would have identified the officers had been police, Paradissis stated: “After all, as a result of that is the very first thing they stated. The cops had been there for different duties they usually heard a brawl.
“In order that they heard some individuals preventing and went there to interrupt up a struggle. They stated, ‘We’re police, cease preventing’. They weren’t in uniform however they confirmed their skilled IDs.”